“What you order at Chipotle says a lot about the type of person you should date,” read a friend’s Facebook post. I paused in scrolling through my feed of recent updates to give this some thought. Horoscopic and facetious for sure, but could it mean anything regardless?
Could there be an underlying personality trait motivating someone to order a burrito versus a burrito bowl? If one person preferred chorizo and the other tofu, was their relationship doomed? Or was this more about the options and add-ons: double meat, brown rice, that extra $2.75 for guacamole?
I liked pretty much everything at Chipotle, so I wondered if this meant I would be compatible with pretty much everyone.
I always imagined myself capable of “making it work” with most people. Another friend once wrote on her high school blog, “The three things that matter in a relationship are timing, location, and personality—in that order.” This stuck with me ever since, and I was reminded of it again now. You could meet the same person at multiple points in your life, and whether a bond developed could depend simply on whether you both happened to be in the right emotional place for it to happen. Whether you were both at Chipotle, so to speak.
Many relationships fail due to unrealistic expectations of romance and love. Those who haven’t been brainwashed by Disney movies agree, “Love is a choice.” I didn’t see why two people couldn’t stay together as long as they shared similar goals and tried to be kind to each other. Tolerance, acceptance, and compromise were more important than sparks and red-hot passion.
Maybe liking all the menu items at a fast food restaurant was comparable to being open-minded about giving chances and trying to make things work in a relationship.
My first boyfriend was a chubby white Japanese major I met at a party in my first semester of college. He wasn’t particularly good-looking, but neither was I, so I figured it would be hypocritical to be shallow. At least he had nice eyes.
It didn’t occur to me that he had a creepy Asian fetish. My best friend at school looked like an eighteen-year-old Nicole Kidman, and I was flattered that he focused on me, instead. (After we broke up, he dated a series of other East Asian women, eventually marrying a Korean who barely spoke English.)
He sometimes cracked jokes that made me uncomfortable, but I went along with them because I wanted to be cooler and less uptight. When he took his shirt off, I thought about the funny feelings I would get from looking at pretty girls and wondered if I would ever get them from a guy. Sometimes I agreed to sex when I didn’t really feel like it, because relationships are about compromise.
I believed I loved him because he was kind to me and called me beautiful. In the back of my mind echoed a line from The Perks of Being a Wallflower: “We accept the love we think we deserve.”
It was a weekday, but I did not go to work. I was lying on the couch at home and watching a romantic comedy on TV called This Means War. Reese Witherspoon was struggling to choose between Chris Pine and Tom Hardy, unaware that the two were friends and coworkers at the CIA. The movie was formulaic, but entertaining and well paced. Good enough for passing time when I was too depressed to move or think.
When Reese’s bawdy best friend (played by Chelsea Handler) advised her, “Don’t choose the better guy; choose the guy that’s going to make you the better girl,” I started sobbing. I don’t usually get emotional during rom-coms, but I must have been the first and only viewer to cry during this one.
My boyfriend came home a few hours later, at around seven in the evening. He headed straight to his computer, asked me to tell him when dinner was ready, and started playing a game.
I met this boyfriend, my third, through a mutual friend. At the time he was a financial analyst, but he quit because he “wanted a long vacation.” He worked temporary gigs for two years, until he signed on to a secretive new job that paid under minimum wage and turned out to be with a multi-level marketing company.
It never occurred to me during our three years together that he was supposed to inspire me to be better and stronger. When we moved in together and I had to do everything his mother used to do at home, I accepted it as part of “making it work.” That he cared more about partying with his new cult than spending time with me felt like a natural progression of a relationship long past its honeymoon phase. That I was more or less the sole source of income seemed to be a reasonable, if less than ideal, result of feminism.
Something in me finally clicked into place that day, after over a decade of contemplating a myriad bits of relationship advice. In all those years of following what I thought was expected or obligatory, I never truly considered my own wants or needs. I could do better—even if it meant being alone.